Thought I might post part of an email from my friend who always has some inciteful observations:
***********************
I've noted that the media has started mixing in casualty figures with any news story that even mentions Iraq. For example, the AP ran a story that was printed in Stars and Stripes on 28 November. The title of the story was "Eight accused of plotting to kill Saddam judge."
The entire story dealt with the trial, but ended in a marvelous non-sequitur, "On Saturday, a U.S. Marine died when his vehicle was hit by a roadside bomb near Camp Taqaddum, 45 miles . . ."
An IED strike near Camp Taqaddum has absolutely no relation to the Saddam trial, but news of Americans dying is often inserted into any Iraq story. I've seen several stories, in which a paragraph of recent war deaths is inserted, seemingly as a non-sequitur. If this apparent desire to constantly pound home the number of American's killed in Iraq continues, we will see it spread to other news stories. "In Princeton, New Jersey, an ice cream vendor made history by offering the first 'beef gravy' flavor. And in Iraq, a marine was killed when his HMMWV . . . . "
Not that I think that the media is anti-Bush, but it appears that they would do anything to discredit the Iraq war. I understand it on the part of the Democrats who want to undermine the war effort for partisan political gains, but newspapers usually at least pretend to be purveyors of impartial reporting.
Maybe Rumsfeld's comment to Joe Lieberman (who suggested that the American people were tilting away from the Iraq war) in testimony to the Armed Services committee was correct.
(loose quote) "You think the American people are tilting away from the war. I think they're being pushed." *******************************
Hawk |