Just the Facts, Ma'am: A Compendium of Liberal Fiction Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Just the Facts, Ma'am: A Compendium of Liberal Fiction

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Solon who wrote (42610)	12/6/2005 6:45:18 AM
From: Sully-	Read Replies (1) of 90947

...."Nobody disputes that Saddam was a threat."..... Well then, you have answered yourself, haven't you? ...."The debate is about whether or not the war had legal basis in self defense"..... Message 21944609 ...."Does the excuse of self defense meet rational criteria to support invasion?".... It's wasn't an excuse. His regime was a real & verifiable threat. Saddam's actions prior to his removal established he was a ongoing threat for the better part of two decades. His egregious violations of the cease fire agreement established he continued to be a threat. And the evidence gathered after his removal irrefutably established he planed on continuing to be a threat as long as he remained in power. If you had bothered to read the evidence I have already provided you, you would already know this all to be true. Message 21944073 Message 21944074 Text of UN Resolution 687 AKA "The Gulf War Cease Fire Agreement. dalebroux.com UN Resolution 1441 un.int

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next