SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : EDTA (was GIFT)
EDTA 0.00005000.0%Nov 14 9:30 AM EST
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: GRC who wrote (1302)9/15/1997 9:38:00 AM
From: Gerald Underwood   of 2383
 
GRC,

Thank you for your interpretation of the Gift brief. Although not what I expected the points you raise certainly are plausible as far as they go. As was pointed out however, the defendents were not responding to the order of the court in not focusing on claim construction. It seems to me it would be fruitless for the Gift attorney to respond in-depth to arguments that were other than that so ordered by the court. Would this not be participating in arguments that were against the order of the court? Would this not give validity to the defendent's right to express such arguments such as they are? How do judge's respond when explicit orders are circumvented? These are all good questions which in my opinion may affect the outcome of the case.

Regards,

Gerry
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News