SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : View from the Center and Left

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: JohnM who wrote (6303)12/10/2005 3:55:48 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (1) of 542169
 
As you may know, however, there is a principled position in political theory which says, as Tim does, that only a "watchman" state can be considered legitimate. Tim might have been defending that. Thus, my response was intended to draw him out in that direction as well.

I would say that a minarchist "watchman" state would certainly extort much less and only extort where the requirement and justification for it is strongest. You wouldn't see me complaining about the scope of the government or the tax burden. I probably would not go around calling it extortion, but it still would be. I don't think it could avoid taxation. It would still be a government taking money by force or threat of force. Unless you can get the force out of it I don't think that it can be said that it is in no way extortion.

Tim
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext