SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Bearcatbob who wrote (150521)12/11/2005 11:39:17 AM
From: carranza2  Read Replies (1) of 793782
 
Additionally, any spending should be controlled by a reconstruction Czar of some sort with the authority to controll and prosecute contract corruption of all types.

I have no problem with that, and I think that is already in the works.

Should all people who live in a flood plain be covered by the feds up to 95%?

Did you ever read anything I wrote suggesting I believe that ought to be the case? You won't find it.

The present plan for flood insurance is fine. If folks need additional coverage, they can buy it.

If you don't think the feds ought to pay 95% of the levees and the flood control project costs, and this is somehow implemented, the projects won't get done.

Might as well shut things down, destroy the existing levees and flood the city once and for all.

Thank God you're not in charge.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News