SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Just the Facts, Ma'am: A Compendium of Liberal Fiction

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Lazarus_Long who wrote (43100)12/13/2005 8:35:33 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (1) of 90947
 
Could not a convention be authorized whose only allowed function is to change the 2nd amendment? Why not?

A convention wouldn't even be needed. You can amend the constitution by Congress and state legislatures voting to do so.

Additionally, anything they come out with has to go through a ratification process like the Constitution did and like any amendment does

Not exactly.

"The second method prescribed is for a Constitutional Convention to be called by two-thirds of the legislatures of the States, and for that Convention to propose one or more amendments. These amendments are then sent to the states to be approved by three-fourths of the legislatures or conventions. "

usconstitution.net

The states still have to approve it but the process is different and it doesn't require congress to vote for it even by a simple majority let alone the normal supermajority.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext