Sioux Nation Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sioux Nation

DJT 13.79

-3.7%

3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: stockman_scott who wrote (52415)	12/14/2005 12:05:02 PM
From: American Spirit	Read Replies (2) of 361853

Just remember, no anti-war candidate has ever won the WH, even in the midst of a very unpopular war. Nixon beat McGovern by a whopping 20%, and McGovern was a war hero, son of a minister and all-around admirable guy. But he was anti-war. The rightwing knows how to smear anyone anti-war of being an unpatriotic coward, quitter and wimp. So our candidates must be largely immune to that kind of BS. Of course Kerry wasn't, even though he too was a war hero. So who is immune? Murtha? Clark? Warner? Or is it more a matter of exposing the smear before it happens next time to defeat that dirty trick ahead of time? And by 2008, will the war still be a major issue? Seemingly by then it will be over, mainly because we don't have enough troops to keep sending there. Of course, Bush (if he survives that long) may start a new war for political reasons. Don't put it past him. Iran is tempting to the neocons and oilmen.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next