SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : A Neutral Corner

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: carranza2 who wrote (1702)12/15/2005 5:28:33 PM
From: Ilaine  Read Replies (1) of 2253
 
Huh. Just took a look at 33 U.S.C. § 702c and some cases citing it in my Casefinder database.

I hope you realize that the 17th Street Canal wasn't primarily intended for flood control -- it's an outfall canal for drainage from the pumps. As is the London Avenue Canal.

That's why no flood gates where they meet the lake. The water was supposed to go out, out from the city, not be kept from coming in from the lake.

Further, the waters that came in were not flood waters, per se, but ordinary lake water. In fact, the lake was not at flood stage, but was extremely low.

The storm surge was flood, sure, but the water that flooded most of New Orleans wasn't storm surge. After the storm passed, the water was just ordinary lake water.

I think it's worth a look.

I am going to draw up a memo and send it to my old boss.

I did two special research projects on wastewater control in college -- one undergrad on storm drainage, and one in law school about the Clean Water Act, both specifically about New Orleans.

And my husband is an environmental engineer specializing in wastewater treatment.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext