Re: "My complaint is that your analysis was wrong because you left out a lot of important information."
GEEZE, Guy!
I made one SHORT post, containing only ONE FACT. It *wasn't* an 'analysis'.
The *true fact* that, thus far, this recovery has been below the average of other post WW II recoveries.
You DO NOT DENY THIS FACT.
Now, are you asking me to post a detailed analysis of this recovery, attempting to come up with reasons to explain the recovery's sub-par performance?
You ALREADY mentioned some reasons --- (9-11 shock, war in Arghanistan, War in Iraq, 'WOT'... I would add some others that the C.B.O. and the G.A.O. pointed out: failure to control run-away government spending, tax policy mix that is less stimulative then a more appropriate mix might be, asset deflation 'exported' from Asia with China and Japan's managed currencies, increasing drag of interest payments on the rising national debt load, soaring costs of Medicare and health care in general, unproductive pork-barrel government spending, tax loopholes that divert economic activity away from productive growth and into the narrow capturing of tax benefits, corporate welfare, unproductive and wasteful government programs all over the place, etc.)
Re: "My complaint is that your analysis was wrong because you left out a lot of important information."
GEEZE Guy! I made ONE COMMENT, and you NEVER ASKED for more... you just went postal.
Are you feeling better now that I have tried to answer the question some that you just ASKED for the first time? |
