Politics for Pros- moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Maurice Winn who wrote (151392)	12/17/2005 11:35:32 AM
From: Thomas A Watson	Read Replies (1) of 793550

Clearly you seem unable to get my point. The Joint Resolution makes a totally self contained justification for the US action. WMD is not the major reason to act. WMD is the major reason to act with extreme caution. WMD could kill tens of thousands of soldiers and have who know how many long term effects. America has zero experience in fighting in chemical or biological environment during active combat. It's all theory. With no WMD, we did not even need the force size used. That's why it was only three weeks. But the reasons all listed in the joint resolution are still 100% valid. Where is your beef???? whitehouse.gov Joint Resolution to Authorize the Use of United States Armed Forces Against Iraq

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next