SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : View from the Center and Left

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Lane3 who wrote (7188)12/17/2005 12:33:43 PM
From: Dale Baker  Read Replies (2) of 541344
 
Like I said, if people want to change the Constitution, then amend it to fit the modern age. Until then, people who swear to uphold and defend it can't claim they are "unduly" bound by its provisions.

As for what information is prized, I prize mine very highly. I am a citizen with rights. I prize its privacy and integrity as deeply as I prize anything else about being American.

My fundamental rights are not negotiable by people who have no right to contravene them absent a judicial warrant. The "balance" is up to them to change via a constitutional process.

It simply isn't the prerogative of the executive to act on their own. Just like it isn't their prerogative to strip citizens of their constitutional rights based on an arbitrary executive decree.

I suspect I could find some constitutional protections that you WOULDN'T want to have stripped for national security reasons. But once you let the executive start rewriting the rules on their own, your protections are gone. Poof.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext