Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: combjelly who wrote (265039)	12/17/2005 7:08:31 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (1) of 1575570

"Bush said such authorization is "fully consistent" with his "constitutional responsibilities and authorities."" Only in the sense that they have an opinion that in times of war, and we are at war with Al Queda, there are essentially no limits on the powers of the president. I don't agree with you we are at war with al Qaida. At least not in the way that term is defined in the Constitution. One direct attack on this country every ten years or more does not a war make. There is no question terrorism is a problem but that to me doesn't justify giving the president wartime powers. Now what is interesting, as noted in this clip, is that they already could wiretap to their hearts content, they just have to ask for a warrant within 72 hours from a body that may have never rejected such a request. But that would require letting someone know about it, which they want to avoid. So they have the NSA, the single most obsessively secret agency in the government, do it, instead of the FBI who has agents that worry about such antiquated ideas like human rights and the Constitution. There is no surprise there. They have done whatever they could to hide their questionable behavior. ted

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next