Amati investors Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Amati investors

AMTX 1.490

-2.0%

Jan 16 3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: MangoBoy who wrote (24861)	9/15/1997 2:59:00 PM
From: SteveG	of 31386

<"gouge" is a pretty loaded word. got anything to back it up or are you just trying to get people's goat?> As you were involved in this thread at that time, you may remember (or you can check back) that this was the word from inside this industry. AMTX tried to get unreasonably high licensing fees for the AMTX linecode to the achieve the standard that ANSI gave their functionality. This was confirmed by others (at least Peter Piper) who heard similar stories. Is this actually what happened? I wasn't there and so can't and don't make representation that this is what occured, but it I believe it to be the case. Since we are probably talking dollars/modem, why else would USRX, ADI and all those who contracted with ADI/AWRE not have licensed from AMTX? S

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next