SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: bentway who wrote (265228)12/19/2005 11:30:44 PM
From: combjelly  Read Replies (2) of 1573824
 
"The military-industrial-government complex"

And who was the first to warn us about this? Eisenhower almost 50 years ago, who is often described at the first political general. And, by the way, a Texan. While I agree with your premise, let me add a couple of complicating factors. For one, most countries are willing to accept a higher rate of causulties and a lower rate of training than we are. These two are interconnected. If we accept that a certain causulty rate is acceptable, then we accept that the burden falls on the lower classes or the most desperate.

Our military will always be more expensive than any other on a per man basis because we tend to value each individual more. But does that excuse our expenses? No, it does not. A large percentage of the money we spend is to fight a foe that no longer exists, the Soviet Union. We need two militaries right now. One that is highly trained and equiped to take out initial threats, and ones at a lower level who hold territory. Both will need state of the art defensive equipment, but they don't need the same degree of offensive capability.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext