SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : View from the Center and Left

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Lane3 who wrote (7573)12/20/2005 2:41:40 PM
From: one_less  Read Replies (2) of 543153
 
"We lose more people to car crashes in a year than we've ever lost to islamicist terrorists or are likely to lose to islamicist terrorists any time soon. Risk assessment calls for putting our resources and our worrying where there are the most lives to be saved."

I am always left in awe of this kind of statement. We are all going to die K. The assessment on what to do about that should be prioritized. At the top of my list is probably the same as yours ... to live. Starting from that point I like to embellish a bit...

To live according to reason: That is an easy one since there is really no escaping reason, is there.

To live a purposeful life: Not as easy since we often find ourselves bound to the paradoxes and ironies of our circumstance. Especially when faced with difficult choices.

To support the common good and encourage others in that direction as well: Beneficent life is one that regards the well being of self and others in similitude, and requires the stretch of imagination beyond material benefits.

So it seems to me that the risk assessment should be regarding the loss of commitment for the common good, rather than merely a head count ... especially since we both know no body gets saved when it is all said and done.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext