SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : I Will Continue to Continue, to Pretend....

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Sully- who wrote (16582)12/22/2005 4:24:09 AM
From: Sully-   of 35834
 
The judge who quit the FISA court

Power Line

The lead story in today's Washington Post concerns the resignation of Judge James Robertson from the FISA court. Judge Robertson didn't explain why he resigned but, according to the Post, "two associates familiar with his decision said yesterday that Robertson privately expressed deep concern that the warrantless surveillance program authorized by the president in 2001 was legally questionable and may have tainted the FISA court's work."

Judge Robertson should be respected for his decision, which appears to have been an act of conscience. However, as the Post acknowledges near the end of its story, Robertson is a liberal judge (very liberal, if my my experience is any indication) who "who has often ruled against the Bush administration's assertions of broad powers in the terrorism fight, most notably in Hamdan v. Rumsfeld." His decision in the Hamdan case was reversed by the unanimous vote of a panel of the D.C. Circuit which included (now) Chief Justice Roberts. The Supreme Court will review that case. The D.C. Circuit ripped Robertson's opinion and, in my view, justifiably so.

powerlineblog.com

washingtonpost.com

powerlineblog.com

powerlineblog.com
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext