SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: LindyBill who wrote (152317)12/22/2005 2:59:02 PM
From: The Philosopher  Read Replies (1) of 793955
 
"We should have serious scientists looking for scientifically valid evidence of the existence or non-existence of an ID."

That's the subject of "Metaphysics," which asks the question: "Is the universe real or not real?" "Is what we see all their is, or is there an unseen universe beyond it?"

The task of a scientist is to deal with the seen world.

I can't agree. The changes in life forms are part of the seen world. Our ability as intelligent beings to modify life forms is part of the seen world. Other changes in life forms in the past are part of the seen world. The mechanism by which those changes have come about is part of the seen world.

ID doesn't ask whether the universe is real. It says, for example, that the human eye at one time didn't exist and now exists, in the same way as a Golden Delicious apple once didn't exist and now exists. The question how these things came into being, what mechanism was responsible for creating these changes, is very much a scientific inquiry.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News