Politics for Pros- moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Lane3 who wrote (152339)	12/22/2005 5:33:52 PM
From: The Philosopher	Read Replies (2) of 793914

It doesn't matter if it's more likely to be correct. It simply isn't science. That's what his issue is about. Science classes teach the best science available. They don't teach needlepoint or religion. You keep repeating that mantra, but without addressing at all the specific issue. Which isn't like you. We know that life forms change. We see it. We know that intelligent beings can change life forms. We do it. Why isn't it scientific to ask whether there are other intelligent beings that also change life forms? What is unscientific about that? Science studies the origins of the universe and asks how it happened. Nobody argues that that isn't science. Why isn't studying the origins of conscious life science? I submit that you call it not science just because you personally don't believe in it. Which is really, really, really bad science. Why

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next