SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum
GLD 375.93-1.8%Nov 14 4:00 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: TobagoJack who wrote (2968)12/29/2005 4:50:16 PM
From: Maurice Winn  Read Replies (2) of 217789
 
TJ, we each made up truth. Perhaps two false truths = one positive truth?

Anyway, why not call people "racist"? It's such a fun thing to do and a total debate winner. Once the call is made, the accused has lost [according to those doing the calling anyway, in their distorted view of truth]. Calling "racist" gives a great air of self-righteous superiority.

Besides which, by saying [or implying] I'm an Adolf lover, you implied I'm a racist. Though perhaps you meant that I'm a vegetarian racist [I dare say the ham I just ate would disagree with that idea - half of it anyway, as I'm obviously racist if I'm happy to eat a pig's body, a pig's DNA being only slightly different from human DNA].

Mq

PS: I wonder if there are many people still called Adolf. It must be a quite uncool name. I dare say there has been a lot of use of deed poll name changing since WWII in Germany when Hitler youth galore historylearningsite.co.uk realized being called Adolf wasn't a career-enhancing move.

I wonder if young people in Iraq are finding that being called Saddam isn't such a great idea. Do you know anyone in China called Mao? How about Hong Kong?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext