SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : The Woodshed

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: tyc:> who wrote (36088)1/1/2006 9:34:28 AM
From: TheSlowLane  Read Replies (2) of 60903
 
tyke - This reminds me of the discussion between Don Coxe and Sue Herrera the last time he was on CNBC. She kept trying to make the point that these stocks (mining stocks) had already gone up a lot, so they must be expensive by "traditional measures". Coxe responded that their earnings have been increasing at a rate that exceeded their share price appreciation and that, in fact, most of them are still trading with single-digit P/E multiples, far below the market average. There is no premium, there is still a discount.

Some people told me that First Quantum (for example) was "too expensive" at $7, at $10, at $15, at $22 and at $25. When you examine their probable earnings trajectory over the next few years, the stock still looks cheap to me.

Personally, I have room in the PF for both types of issues, Steady Eddie's and potential rocket rides. I wouldn't want to go 100% into either category.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext