2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum

GLD 414.48

+0.7%

Jan 9 4:00 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Maurice Winn who wrote (3199)	1/10/2006 1:08:18 PM
From: elmatador	Read Replies (1) of 219232

The issues I described were the means. You're touching the ends what those means could achieve. Surviving means not only get enough for his own. The guy who was more successful in getting the goodies, 10.000 years ago, had a lot of females who want to get a share of those goodies. They were willing to provide sex to them in exchange for a part of the catch. Sex for the female were a means to get what they want, i.e., babies. Then the guys started being charged with more and more babies. He wanted to put a cap on this and with that family born. If he limited the number of females, he knew whose babies he had to provide for. Not only that, this guy started having more goodies than he could spend during this life time. He had to leave them to someone else wife and kids. Which follows he should know who could inherit the stuff he had.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next