View from the Center and Left Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : View from the Center and Left

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: KLP who wrote (9096)	1/16/2006 3:15:41 PM
From: Alastair McIntosh	Read Replies (1) of 541477

I'm repeating myself, but the reason for my original post was the title to the piece you posted: Two key IAEA flaws that led to North Korean nukes My point was that the flaws were in the Agreed Framework which was negotiated by the US, not the IAEA. The headline seemed strange to me. Going forward, some form of engagement is the only rational policy. A military option seems to be out of the question. With hundreds of long range artillery pieces aimed at Seoul plus hundreds of short range missiles, South Korea could be destroyed within hours. I don't understand the point of your question "Which country/countries would you not want to have both nuclear bombs and be able to get missiles from NK????" Why would I want any country to have nuclear bombs?

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next