SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Ask Michael Burke

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: David R. Doerr who wrote (22800)9/17/1997 10:44:00 AM
From: Knighty Tin   of 132070
 
David, After it becomes disallowed, you would simply have to pay tax the next year. There is really no such thing as tax elimination, just tax deferment.

When you short 100 shares of a $50 stock, $5000 less commissions is paid into your account by the person who buys the shares, just as it is done in a normal sale. That cash obviously draw interest somewhere and it is paid to someone. Usually, a modest amount is paid to the brokerage or bank that lends the shares and your broker should get a modest amount for setting up the trade. However, anywhere from 70 pct. to 95 pct. (what Soros and the Bass Brothers get) should be yours. Since most brokerage firms do not pay it to retail customers, they are simply stealing it for their own profits. I have even heard brokers feign absolute ignorance about the rebate, and in some case they actually are ignorant. I even heard one guy say that such an arrangement would be against the law. -g- But, without a rebate, you are giving up a lot to pro short sellers.

Since brokers are members of the ass family, donkey pictures won't work. -g- MB
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext