Fact is, you are biased. Clinton did what he did, and he did it without a warrant. Bush? Likewise. Very different? Somewhat. Different rules? You bet. If the news I heard was incorrect, it was honestly incorrect, plainly. Yet knowing the facts, I know it essentially stands. The issue is is changes in the law, and very different situations, to boot.
You lie over and over about Bush, for instance claiming he cheated to win elections when there are no charges, no convictions, and plainly therefore, no real evidence save in your fantasy. Meanwhile, the other day Democratic children of a former Democratic Mayor and a Representative were convicted of slashing the tires of Republican's vehicles on election day. Just chips off the old blocks, eh?
Oh, I forgot, such convictions of Democrats must be the result of Republican dirty tricks, as Democrats are too holier than thou to even consider such acts. Right.
Dan B. |
