SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : View from the Center and Left

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Lane3 who wrote (9489)1/23/2006 11:25:45 AM
From: epicure  Read Replies (2) of 541654
 
Why should someone who is doing nothing affirmative to hurt others, be effectively banned from going in to establishments? If bars were allowed to have premises where you were punched for stepping in the door, I'm not sure that would be justifiable. You can't tell the victim of an assault "You shouldn't have gone in there"- and I feel the same way about smoking. So I don't see the problem. I feel the same way about people spitting in my eye- it's also an assault- and no business should be able to run a place that allowed people to spit on someone just because they happened to walk in the door.

I think people should be able to do whatever they want (mostly) up until the time they physically interfere with a person. I'm very lax on visual intrusions, because they are avoidable- you can look the other way. But you can't breathe the other way, so we aren't going to agree on this. And btw, I'm all for smokers killing themselves with cigarettes, I just don't want to go with them. I don't believe in protecting people from their drugs of choice- but I do think where the user begins to make ME take the drug with them (goes for pot smoke too)- it's gone too far.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext