SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Makin' money honey
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: sandintoes who wrote (1990)1/24/2006 6:54:47 PM
From: stock leader  Read Replies (1) of 2260
 
that's not what i meant. i meant WTC buildings were not built for safety in terms of escape alternatives (ladders, ropes, anything,etc.) (sorta how apartment buildings have fire escapes) also there were no safety supplies inside like parachutes, etc.

so in other words, safety officials consider the chance of such events as very remote therefore they don't provide the resources to handle such an event. but i think they should (especially in the WTC since it had already been bombed in 1993)
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News