SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Big Dog's Boom Boom Room

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Ottrose who wrote (57891)1/25/2006 10:10:23 PM
From: quehubo  Read Replies (2) of 206270
 
I assumed 6,500 bcf per year or 17.8 per day.

eia.doe.gov

The one problem I have with these green issues is they overstate their case. I understood that 3,000 MW was going to replace 5% of ng used for generation.

3,000,000 kw capacity
10,000 btu kwhr
30,000,000,000 btu hour
1,020
29,411,765 hour
8 hours a day
1,000,000,000 bcf
0.24 bcf per day

This looks like about 1.3% per day assuming 33% capacity factor. I agree these units are very easy to make an error with in these circumstances, they are also very easy to manipulate.

The problem in general is that the environazi's think green power is going to replace fossil or nuke generation. 20 years from now these types of energy sources are unlikely to provide more than a few % of new generation. So stopping a coal plant because it is not wind power plant is reckless.

It is not either or, but both.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext