SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: tejek who wrote (269978)1/27/2006 3:17:44 AM
From: RetiredNow  Read Replies (1) of 1570915
 
There's a lot of truth in that article. After 9/11, I also was a little surprised to see that Iran was making symptathetic gestures to the US and was even more suprised when Bush didn't take any one of the many openings that the Iranians gave us to pursue at least a thawing of relations. Then with the axis of evil speech, he essentially declared war on Iran. That and all of the other events in the Middle East, and the election of Ahmenedijad, pretty much ended any possibilities of a thaw any time soon with Iran. So I agree with much that is in that article and will openly say, as I have always said, that Bush doesn't have a diplomatic bone in his body, which is why this country is disliked by every other country except the UK and Israel at this moment in our history.

Having said all that, I'm not willing to let Iran get a nuclear bomb, just because we have an idiot for a President. If the price for Bush being inept at diplomacy leads to a need to bomb Iran to ensure they don't get the nukes, then so be it. It's a tragedy because there were multiple diplomatic openings that Bush scuttled, but pretending that we can let Iran get nukes is compounding Bush's mistakes by an order of magnitude.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext