SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : View from the Center and Left

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Lane3 who wrote (10268)1/29/2006 3:51:12 PM
From: JohnM  Read Replies (1) of 541761
 
I am delighted that the SC found the right to privacy in the Constitution and that abortions are legal. My only objection to your claiming that they found a right to an abortion rather than a right to choose.

That's a little like saying the right to vote is not the right to vote, only the right to choose to vote. We continue to disagree.

As for your distinction between rights and freedom, if you wish to argue it, fine. I simply don't see the point.

Roe v Wade didn't establish a "freedom" for an abortion; just as various constitutional provisions don't establish a "freedom" to vote. They lay out a right.

Now if you wish to take E's position, that there are different kinds of rights, affirmative and, hmmmm, let's call them passive, though there is a better term, I just can't pull it out of the relevant brain cell at the moment. If you wish to do that, and argue that Roe is not a decision that enshrines an affirmative right in the sense that the government is actually obligated to provide the hospitals, doctors, etc. Then we agree.

Which still leaves me with the original point of this conversation?? that it's a hollow right when provisions aren't made for poor women to have abortions if they so wish.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext