Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Bilow who wrote (181011)	1/31/2006 10:42:41 AM
From: Keith Feral	Read Replies (1) of 281500

As far as great debates go, the discussion here with you and Hawk is one of the best. You are starting to make some huge points, not that anyone is keeping score. However, you have a great point of view that none of the liberal bashers are intellectually gifted enough to make. I'm not even really sure where you are going with your analysis, except to challenge the degenerating position of the US in Iraq. Of course, our purpose in Iraq is destined to diminish over time. Maybe Murtha has more sense than we gave him credit. We owe it to the Iraqis to help them in the transition. However, we have to program our reduction of troops independent of the violence in Iraq, which is quite simply a fact of life at this point. It's like the same of the chicken and the egg? What is going to happen first, are we going to reduce some of the troops or are the insurgents going to stop the suicide bombing?

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next