SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : View from the Center and Left

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: TimF who wrote (10478)2/1/2006 12:27:56 PM
From: Lane3  Read Replies (1) of 541487
 
This is a service but is it not a socialist system? It isn't the norm now, but it could become the norm in the future.

Government-provided utilities are pretty much the norm, now. Seems to me that wireless broadband is easly considered a utility. It also has something in common with street sweeping and street lighting, provided to make the street more habitable. The initiatives that I have seen have been in commercial areas, like Old Town Alexandria, where they want to attract people.

Not just goods, but also services. If the government ran shoe-shining facilities, or massage parlors all over the place would they not be part of a socialist system?

There is one important distinction between goods and services, I think, which is that it is easier to be totalitarian about goods given that the average person cannot build a refrigerator so the government has a monopoly. Monopolies on services are harder to achieve. Most anyone can cut hair or shine shoes so even if the government provides those services, there's no monopoly, just as there is no monopoly on schools. I think that's relevant.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext