SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : View from the Center and Left

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Lane3 who wrote (10505)2/1/2006 2:03:44 PM
From: JohnM  Read Replies (2) of 541701
 
From each...to each is Marx 101.

It certainly is in the popular imagination but it's hardly unique with Marx. That idea has been around a rather long time and, even in the 19th century, was hardly simply a "Marxist" idea.

The term "redistributionist" is another interesting term here. I consider the Bush tax cuts "redistributionist" by providing more income and benefits for wealthy upper class tax payers and taking it from the benefits structure for middle class (dropping support for assistance to higher education, as the clearest instance) and the poor.

In my view, the best arguments for single payer health insurance is not a redistributional one but a public health policy one and, increasingly, an economic advantage one. It establishes a floor for coverage not a cap on coverage.

It's very hard to say just how moving from the present system to a single payer system would "redistribute" income and wealth. It might just be a wash. But that's way too complex. I've not seen anyone tackle that one.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext