View from the Center and Left Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : View from the Center and Left

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Lane3 who wrote (11008)	2/6/2006 7:09:34 PM
From: TigerPaw	Read Replies (2) of 541824

don't agree to compensation in fish in the first place The worker does not really have the option to be compensated in an "immortal" series of payments the way the owner does. It really doesn't matter that he can try to add the role of owner to his role as worker. The real root of the problem is that returns from owner ship which theoreticly last for an infinity of time and so have an infinite value. The solution is not to find ways for the worker to have some little slice of the ownership, but instead to recognize that the investment too was just a one time contribution and does not deserve an infinity of returns. That will equalize the compensation, but more importantly, it will equalize the opportunity for getting to the (now transitory) ownership position. TP

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next