SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Alaska Natural Gas Pipeline

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
From: Dennis Roth2/8/2006 9:51:10 AM
  Read Replies (1) of 570
 
Plans for natural gas pipeline still months away
shns.com

By RICHARD RICHTMYER
Anchorage Daily News
07-FEB-06

JUNEAU, Alaska -- A natural gas pipeline contract is unlikely to surface for months, legislative leaders said Monday, and they have not even seen new oil tax legislation that would be a key component of any gas line deal.

House Speaker John Harris and Majority Leader John Coghill Jr. mapped out a timeline Monday for the two mammoth legislative initiatives _ an overhaul of the state's oil production tax and ratifying a natural gas pipeline contract _ that even in a best-case scenario runs into the summer.

"I'm going to guess, without having a crystal ball, that we'll have an extended session out of this before it's all over," said Harris, R-Valdez.

Gov. Frank Murkowski's administration has been negotiating for nearly two years with the North Slope producers for a contract setting out terms for the proposed pipeline to carry natural gas to the Lower 48.

If or when a contract proposal is brought forward, that would be only one of several difficult and time-consuming steps.

If they were to reach a deal, the contract would be open for a two-month public review before going to the Legislature for approval. The administration would be allowed 30 days to renegotiate after the public review, which could mean up to a three-month delay before lawmakers begin their debate.

The Legislature is scheduled to adjourn its regular session in just over three months on May 9.

Further clouding the prospects of a gas line deal is a proposal to revamp the state's oil production tax.

The governor has said the Legislature will have to replace the current production-based oil tax with a tax tied to the oil companies' Alaska profits, before his team can ink a gas line deal. He said the producers want to know how much oil tax they will have to pay in the future before making a gas line deal.

An oil tax revision on this scale, legislators and analysts say, is a huge, complicated and risky undertaking.

But it remained unclear Monday when a definitive plan would be introduced and who would sponsor it.

At first, members of Murkowski's administration said the governor would introduce a bill. They have since backpedaled, saying they are working with the legislative leadership and suggesting that a lawmaker would introduce an oil tax bill.

"Do we intend to introduce an (oil tax) bill? No. I think we'll work with the administration, and our hope is that the administration will introduce a bill here very shortly," Harris said Monday.

(Distributed by Scripps-McClatchy Western Service, shns.com.)
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext