The sarcasm was intentional as I don't believe you were asking a simple question.  You have represented in your posts that Bandai is LOSING money, when in truth that is NOT the case.
  In your post #149, you wrote, in part, "Second, from what I gather, THIS COMPANY IS LOSING SOME MAJOR BUCKS for what they have to offer." (Completely untrue!)
  In your post #154, you wrote, in part, "As for Bandai, I wasn't stating that they were losing money but what little I have found on them leads me to believe this."  In fact, you DID state they were losing money (if you consider "major bucks" as money). Then you indicate that what little you did find on them led you believe this ... meaning that they WERE losing money from what little you read.  This is a false denial compounded with an vauge reference to some conclusion you reached based on something you did find, you say,  but now don't know what or where.  I don't believe you.
  In your post #156, you wrote, in part, "What I read was based on fact."  But then you go on to state where you BELIEVE you found it and complain about how difficult it is to find anything.  What you found was NOT based on fact because Bandai is NOT losing money or "major bucks."  No wonder it is so hard to find it.  And, in fact, there is a tremendous amount of information already out and published practically every day in the major newspapers. Much more than any other small comapny.  If you would read all the posts, the company homepage, and even the links on this thread alone you would find enough information to keep you busy for a long time.  What you found, if anything, was NOT based on "fact."
  Out of ignorance or some other reason, you chose to malign a company with statements that are completely untrue and then you  try to deny what you wrote or claim it was an innocent "simple" question.  I have an investment in this company and I don't like it when someone FALSELY states it is losing MAJOR BUCKS, that you deduced that they were losing money for some unstated reason, or that your statement was "based on fact" ... The fact of the matter is that you don't know what you are talking about and you are spreading lies about the company on the Internet. |