COMS & the Ghost of USRX w/ other STUFF Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : COMS & the Ghost of USRX w/ other STUFF

COMS 0.00130

0.0%

Nov 4 10:50 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: David Lawrence who wrote (5352)	9/18/1997 2:35:00 AM
From: Dwight E. Karlsen	of 22053

I agree. A recent review of neworking equip in PC Magazine showed Microcom to be the dominant failure, by a wide margin. How CPQ keeps foisting off inferior product on its customers is beyond me. I can't locate which issue or what exact equip was reviewed, but a search of the PC Mag web site would turn up the article. CPQ makes excellent servers and average PCs and notebooks, so IMO they could best use their resources to making better PCs and notebooks. It seems a little odd to be announcing major product development initiatives at this stage of the game. I have a lot of respect for the Intel R&D guys, but it seems to me that COMS has "a little" more experience in designing and manufacturing NICs etc. DK

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next