Pluvia vs. Westergaard Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : Pluvia vs. Westergaard

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Cisco who wrote (1155)	9/18/1997 8:43:00 AM
From: Thomas G. Busillo	of 1267

Cisco, I never heard of the firm. Martindale-Hubbel is the name of the legal directory whose name escaped me last night. Should give an overview of the firm's practice. Don't know if they're online. On the flipside, I don't think Pluvia should be complacent and assume that just because they haven't filed anything as of this point, they won't. Not saying they will, but it is an option, albeit one they seem to have been reluctant to take, which then gets you back to the question of "well why haven't they?" One answer could be that there are obviously risks. Totally conjecture, and perhaps I'm giving PLSIA's counsel too much credit, but I'm assuming Mr. Brokington actually does understand the risks involved and isn't about to rush into litigation just for the sake of litigation. Don't know. Good trading, Tom

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next