You can dream. But I wonder about that "Declaration of War" and Bush-League being "The War Time President" angle. If we are not at war, in the legal sense, then Bush Baby's power grab is completely illegal. Adding in Bush, Rove, Cheney, Addington, Libby and Halliburton (left out Enron, Ambramoff, Carlyle, WMD, no-find Osama, and current global protests).
To cook this goose define "war" and make it stick.
Want to see evidence of "war" other than what we caused in Iraq.
An incident, a crime, is not a "war".
Because Bush said "we are at war" does he get all power?
If so, then one had better define what "war" is and compare current claims against that objective standard.
There is an legal argument here.
i. |
