SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : E.Schwab problems

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: tom pope who wrote (1194)2/22/2006 12:05:27 PM
From: keokalani'nui   of 1401
 
Schwab to insure against account losses

E-mail | Print | | Disable live quotes By Lisa Sanders, MarketWatch
Last Update: 11:29 AM ET Feb 22, 2006

NEW YORK (MarketWatch) -- Charles Schwab Corp. responded to investors' concerns about theft in their online brokerage accounts by announcing Wednesday it would cover 100% of losses stemming from unauthorized activity.
Schwab (SCHW : Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. said it has historically insured against those types of losses, but with the announcement Wednesday the practice turned into "a public promise."
Schwab's move comes at a critical time for the industry. Incidences of hacking into online brokerage accounts are growing. See full story.
According to data gathered by MarketWatch, around half of Schwab's 7 million clients do business with the company online. E-Trade has 3.6 million of online accounts throughout the world. Ameritrade (AMTD : and Fidelity Investments are also popular destinations for online transactions.
"Given rising public concerns over identity theft and cyber-fraud, we think adding a clear and simple guarantee will contribute to even greater peace of mind for our clients," said Charles Schwab, founder and CEO, in a statement.
On Jan. 17, E-Trade (ET : e trade financial launched a program to provide fraud coverage for clients who may have lost money or securities in their accounts because of theft.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext