SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Crash Index

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Tradelite who wrote (48953)2/22/2006 7:34:43 PM
From: orkriousRead Replies (1) of 306849
 
I'm familiar with two insurance companies (my father's and my own) which seem to discourage owning this type of policy.

Possibly because they have to sell a hell of a lot of policies to pay for a claim.

I sure wouldn't go without one. I have a $2.0 mil policy for which I think I pay around $300. I only insure those things I can't afford to lose. That means, my house, my car, and my personal liability. It wouldn't even kill me if my car was totaled and it wasn't insured, but there's a decent enough chance of it happening that I don't drop the collision coverage. I don't buy any other type of insurance, whether it's on an appliance I buy or a car I rent. If my refrigerator breaks I'll buy a new one.

But if I accidently run a red light and paralyze the father of four kids, I'm in deep shit. I'm not sure $2.0 million is enough coverage, but it's what I have. If I didn't have an umbrella policy and I had a serious accident I'd be very sorry. I'm a cheap bastard, but I'm not that cheap. Insure the things you can't afford to self-insure.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext