Presstek -- Stock of the Decade?? Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Presstek -- Stock of the Decade??

PRST 0.0001000

0.0%

Sep 29 10:16 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: E who wrote (6385)	9/18/1997 12:49:00 PM
From: Father E.	of 11098

Disclaimer: Please read reply 6293 and the Terms of Use before reading this post. That is the point. This is such a complex issue. One of Supreme Court status why would the company want to go to court on this? If there lawyer bills by the hour and not a yearl salary I could see why he would be interested. But in my opinion, and I havn't spoken to any lawyers yet. Some constitutional issues could be dragged in. Why does the company want to deal with it. I am sure you are clever enough to see the difference between talking about overpriced stock, hearing a rumor of auditors threatening to leave (maybe they heard the rumor from the same Pru broker that told Neil about the alcoa deal) and a woman going around for a competitor and telling peiople that a company has to do with Satatnic stuff. If I recall it was traced back to that woman. If these guys tell the court who they got their info from and all they did was post info they got what is illegal about that? Unless the co could prove that they need it was lies and intentionally posted it anyhow. Mother, do you think anyone here would be stupid enough to puposely post lies?

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next