SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: The Philosopher who wrote (21047)3/2/2006 7:04:27 PM
From: TimF   of 21057
 
1 - The Supreme Court should overturn it because the original decision was not solidly grounded in the constitution. Stare decisis and maybe other concerns might argue against overturn, but the original decisions (and the decisions it was based on) are fundamentally flawed IMO.

2 - They will uphold it. They might allow more restriction than they would have in the past but they are not going to overrule Roe vs. Wade, and allowing this law will strike down Roe vs. Wade, most likely if they did allow this law to stand they would explicitly strike down Roe vs. Wade, but even if it was not an official part of the decision effectively Roe vs. Wade would be dead.

Tim
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News