Re: "They said they have no proof of any collaborative relations with Al Qaeda...and no connection to 9-11. I guess that would be no proof"
I guess that means when you claimed they said there was no connection, instead of no proof of one, you were simply flat-out wrong. Yup. As noted, even they produced evidence of the both connections you note, and fairly compelling all in all, IMHO.
Re: "I've never heard of the judge you're talking about."
Wow, you really haven't read a thing that doesn't promote your own point of view, it seems. I, on the other hand, have read plenty which doesn't comport with mine, right here on the thread for starters.
Are you afraid to study the link I provided? If not, you soon would never have to ask how the Clinton appointed judge came to rule that Iraq had ties to Al Qaeda sufficient to rule against Iraq.
There is plenty of very plausible evidence of the connection between Saddam and Terrorism AND Al Qaeda. It comes from ABC news, and CNN even, among many other sources.
You've plainly chosen to dismiss it all, yet as surely as you say you haven't heard of the judge I was talking about, you obviously have stuck your reading eyes in the sands of stilted anti-Iraq war propaganda only.
Dan B. |
