SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)
INTC 36.82+1.5%Dec 19 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: The Duke of URL© who wrote (183643)3/4/2006 10:35:14 AM
From: smooth2o  Read Replies (1) of 186894
 
Well, like Sarmad said, reportedly some of this is due to chipsets. Some others think it's entirely AMD's "right" architecture that is compelling (and therefore, is a disruptive event). And then, there's the fact that Intel has not been competitive with their products (although very close, close enough).

Let's see, what goes away...
Limited manufacturability with AMD...nope.
Non-competitive Intel products....yep.
Chipset problems...yep.
Higher Intel pricing....yep.
AMD's performance advantage....yep.
AMD's leadership throne.... yep.

Recently, I visited CC and instead of just counting machines (~50/50 and one Sony Core Duo), I talked to the salesperson. He, like many others, I am sure pick up tidbits of this stuff (Yahoo?) and pass it along to their customers. I wanted to find out how much he really knew and wound up "gently" straightening him out on a few concepts in his selling guides and facts he didn't know. He was selling brand names more than processors. He was very grateful.

When you sit in the store with a 50/50 mix, it's not hard to have at least 50% of the market.

Smooth
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext