SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (278028)3/4/2006 8:44:43 PM
From: Amy J  Read Replies (1) of 1571808
 
RE: "Where's the "common ground" with Al Qaeda?"

For propaganda reasons, this isn't printed in the USA. The USA media tends to eliminate this part when they print anything on bin Laden. I don't believe American media serves Americans well on this issue.

Overseas, they focus on the common ground solution (which is good). But they also avoid printing the murderous threats (which is not good to hide this part). The good thing though, is unlike the USA, they repeatedly print the common solution message so many times that the solution is very clear for folks overseas (which sort of makes Americans look less-than-informed because it gives us the appearance of being unable to "get it.")

In a nutshell, the message (that is also the common solution) is the removal of the military out of SA and religious areas in ME. This has been bin Laden's very consistent message. This message was consistent throughout the 90s and thru today. If we were independent from oil, it's actually something this country could have easily have done, and bin Laden would have been history. But since we're not independent of oil, the US feels it necessary to keep troops overseas and thus bin Laden continues to be a threat.

I think it would have been more beneficial to our economy if we had spent $400B per year on alternative sources of energy (including Fowler's idea of promoting the use of alternative sources of energy), to get off of our dependency of oil, rather than dig ourselves further into a rut without any way out. I personally don't like the idea of us being sitting ducks for bin Laden to attack, because we haven't proactively gotten off our dependency on oil.

RE: "Saddam"

Iraq was not a threat to the USA. He was the US govt's buddy during the 80s. I really don't understand why Iraq was attacked for 9/11, when they had nothing to do with 9/11. History will say Bush attacked a country without cause, and he eventually will go down as a very illegal president. I suspect a judgment of war crimes will be made against him - for attacking a country without any cause.

Regards,
Amy J
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext