Popular Mechanics Takes on Katrina Myths
Noel Sheppard
The American Thinker
March 6th, 2006
Last week’s Associated Press release of a video, taken just prior to Hurricane Katrina’s arrival in New Orleans last August, has generated a new round of second-guessing and finger pointing regarding who is to blame for the supposedly slow, poor response to this natural disaster. Falling under the fold was an in-depth cover story on this subject by an unlikely source, Popular Mechanics.
In its March issue, PM took on virtually all of the media myths and misnomers that were so drilled into the citizenry by press representatives that many have become part of the public psyche. Thankfully, its authors made it clear right in the first paragraph that they planned on pulling no punches:
“In the months since the storm, many of the first
impressions conveyed by the media have turned out to be
mistaken.”
How mistaken? Well, PM and its staff put together a list of seven myths concerning Katrina that have been purported by the media, and like a good mechanic, quickly isolated the flaws inherent in the press coverage while making much-needed repairs.
Myth #1:
<<< “’The aftermath of Katrina will go down as one of the worst abandonments of Americans on American soil ever in U.S. history.’\’>>>
—Aaron Broussard, president, Jefferson Parish, La., Meet the Press, NBC, Sept. 4, 2005”
For those that have forgotten, Broussard is the man that cried on Meet the Press the Sunday after Katrina hit, claiming that a co-worker’s mother died in New Orleans as a result of the delay in the rescue effort. Broussard’s claims were later thoroughly discredited. In addition, Broussard was responsible for dismissing all of the pump operators in Jefferson Parish before the storm arrived, and is in the middle of a lawsuit filed by parish residents that claim this decision was largely responsible for the flooding.
That said, PM didn’t agree with Broussard’s assertions regarding this matter either:
“Bumbling by top disaster-management officials fueled a
perception of general inaction, one that was compounded
by impassioned news anchors. In fact, the response to
Hurricane Katrina was by far the largest—and fastest-
rescue effort in U.S. history, with nearly 100,000
emergency personnel arriving on the scene within three
days of the storm’s landfall.”
Certainly, it seems hard to categorize 100,000 workers as an abandonment. Unlike many in the media that make such bold statements without verification, PM backed up its position with actual facts. How refreshing:
“Dozens of National Guard and Coast Guard helicopters
flew rescue operations that first day—some just 2 hours
after Katrina hit the coast. Hoistless Army helicopters
improvised rescues, carefully hovering on rooftops to
pick up survivors. On the ground, ‘guardsmen had to chop
their way through, moving trees and recreating roadways,’
says Jack Harrison of the National Guard. By the end of
the week, 50,000 National Guard troops in the Gulf Coast
region had saved 17,000 people; 4000 Coast Guard
personnel saved more than 33,000.”
As the proof is often in the pudding, PM bolstered its view on this myth with the following conclusion:
“While the press focused on FEMA’s shortcomings, this
broad array of local, state and national responders
pulled off an extraordinary success—especially given the
huge area devastated by the storm. Computer simulations
of a Katrina-strength hurricane had estimated a worst-
case-scenario death toll of more than 60,000 people in
Louisiana. The actual number was 1077 in that state.”
It’s amazing how quickly the press forgot their own highly publicized casualty estimates in the tens of thousands, and saw no victory in that number coming in 90 to 95 percent less than they had advertised.
Myth #2:
<<< “’This is a once-in-a-lifetime event.’>>>
—New Orleans Mayor C. Ray Nagin, press conference, Aug. 28, 2005”
Regardless of how this storm was being hyped at the time, we now know that Katrina’s wind-strength significantly diminished in the final hours as it approached New Orleans. As PM put it:
“Though many accounts portray Katrina as a storm of
unprecedented magnitude, it was in fact a large, but
otherwise typical, hurricane. On the 1-to-5 Saffir-
Simpson scale, Katrina was a midlevel Category 3
hurricane at landfall. Its barometric pressure was 902
millibars (mb), the sixth lowest ever recorded, but
higher than Wilma (882mb) and Rita (897mb), the storms
that followed it. Katrina’s peak sustained wind speed at
landfall 55 miles south of New Orleans was 125 mph; winds
in the city barely reached hurricane strength.
“By contrast, when Hurricane Andrew struck the Florida
coast in 1992, its sustained winds were measured at 142
mph. And meteorologists estimate that 1969’s Category 5
Hurricane Camille, which followed a path close to
Katrina’s, packed winds as high as 200 mph.”
The reality is that had the levees held there would have been comparatively little damage to New Orleans as a result of this storm. However, in PM’s view, there is another issue raised by this disaster that has gone largely ignored:
“According to the National Hurricane Center in Miami, the
Atlantic is in a cycle of heightened hurricane activity
due to higher sea-surface temperatures and other factors.
The cycle could last 40 years, during which time the
United States can expect to be hit by dozens of Katrina-
size storms. Policymakers-and coastal residents-need to
start seeing hurricanes as routine weather events, not
once-in-a-lifetime anomalies.”
Myth #3:
<<< “’Perhaps not just human error was involved [in floodwall failures]. There may have been some malfeasance.’>>>
—Raymond Seed, civil engineering professor, UC, Berkeley, testifying before a Senate committee, Nov. 2, 2005”
There’s been a lot of second-guessing and finger pointing concerning the levee design, and who was responsible for their failure. According to PM, these were all built according to specifications:
“Most of the New Orleans floodwall failures occurred when
water up to 25 ft. high overtopped the barriers, washing
out their foundations. But three breached floodwalls-one
in the 17th Street Canal and two in the London Avenue
Canalshowed no signs of overtopping. Accusations of
malfeasance were born after the Army Corps of Engineers
released seismic data suggesting that the sheet-pile
foundations supporting those floodwalls were 7 ft.
shorter than called for in the design-a possible cause for
collapse. In December 2005, PM watched Corps engineers
pull four key sections of the 17th Street Canal
foundation out of the New Orleans mud. The sections were
more than 23 ft. long-as per design specifications. ‘I
had heard talk about improper building before the sheet-
pile pull,’ the Corps’ Wayne Stroupe says. ‘But not much
since.’”
Myth #4:
<<< “’They have people … been in that frickin’ Superdome for five days watching dead bodies, watching hooligans killing people, raping people.’ >>>
—New Orleans Mayor C. Ray Nagin, The Oprah Winfrey Show, Sept. 6, 2005”
Some of the most pathetic and shameful reporting on Katrina dealt with the supposed violence occurring in both the streets and at the Superdome. As PM declared, almost all of these reports turned out to be similar to the rubbish that piled up around New Orleans:
Both public officials and the press passed along lurid tales of post-Katrina mayhem: shootouts in the Superdome, bodies stacked in a convention center freezer, snipers firing on rescue helicopters. And those accounts appear to have affected rescue efforts as first responders shifted resources from saving lives to protecting rescuers.
In reality, although looting and other property crimes were widespread after the flooding on Monday, Aug. 29, almost none of the stories about violent crime turned out to be true. Col. Thomas Beron, the National Guard commander of Task Force Orleans, arrived at the Superdome on Aug. 29 and took command of 400 soldiers. He told PM that when the Dome’s main power failed around 5 am,
‘it became a hot, humid, miserable place. There was some
pushing, people were irritable. There was one attempted
rape that the New Orleans police stopped.’”
What were some of the other numbers?
“The only confirmed account of a weapon discharge
occurred when Louisiana Guardsman Chris Watt was jumped
by an assailant and, during the chaotic arrest,
accidently shot himself in the leg with his own M-16.
“When the Superdome was finally cleared, six bodies were
found—not the 200 speculated. Four people had died of
natural causes; one was ruled a suicide, and another a
drug overdose. Of the four bodies recovered at the
convention center, three had died of natural causes; the
fourth had sustained stab wounds.”
Some mayhem, huh? And how about the supposed anarchy in the streets, or snipers shooting at rescue operators?
“‘The vast majority of people [looting] were taking food
and water to live,’ says Capt. Marlon Defillo, the New
Orleans Police Department’s commander of public
affairs. ‘There were no killings, not one murder.’ As for
sniper fire: No bullet holes were found in the fuselage
of any rescue helicopter.”
Amazing.
Myth #5:
<<< “‘The failure to evacuate was the tipping point for all the other things that … went wrong.’ >>>
—Michael Brown, former FEMA director, Sept. 27, 2005”
This myth is particularly delicious given the press’s newfound adoration of Brown, even though their complaints about his performance in September got him fired. Regardless, when you look at the arithmetic and the facts, this really was a very successful evacuation. PM agreed:
“When Nagin issued his voluntary evacuation order, a
contraflow plan that turned inbound interstate lanes into
outbound lanes enabled 1.2 million people to leave New
Orleans out of a metro population of 1.5 million. ‘The
Corps estimated we would need 72 hours [to evacuate that
many people],’ says Brian Wolshon, an LSU civil
engineer. ‘Instead, it took 38 hours.’”
Another myth in this regard was that the only people that didn’t evacuate were those that couldn’t. Not so according to PM:
“Later investigations indicated that many who stayed did
so by choice. ‘Most people had transportation,’ says Col.
Joe Spraggins, director of emergency management in
Harrison County, Ala. ‘Many didn’t want to leave.’ Tragic
exceptions: hospital patients and nursing home residents.”
Myth #6:
<<< “‘We will rebuild [the Gulf Coast] bigger and better than ever.’ >>>
—Haley Barbour, Miss. Gov., The Associated press, Sept. 3, 2005”
There’s been much discussion in the media concerning what should be done with New Orleans after its destruction. PM offered a bold view in this regard. Its premise was that the current National Flood Insurance Program rewards people who live in coastal areas subject to floods, with some making multiple claims for very large sums of money:
“Just 1 to 2 percent of claims were from ‘repetitive-loss
properties’-those suffering damage at least twice in a 10-
year period. Yet, those 112,000 properties generated a
remarkable 40 percent of the losses-$5.6 billion. One
homeowner in Houston filed 16 claims in 18 years,
receiving payments totaling $806,000 for a building
valued at $114,000.
“Just as significantly, the five Gulf Coast states
accounted for half the total of repetitive-loss costs
nationwide. Taxpayers across the country are paying for a
minute number of people to rebuild time and time again in
the path of hurricanes.”
By contrast, the government doesn’t view tornado or earthquake damage with anywhere near as broad a scope:
“Folks in Tornado Alley and along the San Andreas fault
don’t get federally backed insurance, so why should
taxpayers subsidize coastal homes, many of them vacation
properties?”
Great question. So, what’s the answer that PM offered which few media would have the guts to espouse?
“Before we start rebuilding ‘bigger and better,’ Congress
should reform the flood insurance program. A good start:
Structure premiums so the program is actuarially sound
and clamps down on repetitive claims.”
Great idea, folks. Let’s see that one get through a contentious Congress.
Myth #7:
<<< “‘You have a major energy network that is down … We could run out of gasoline or diesel or jet fuel in the next two weeks here.’ >>>
—Roger Diwan, managing director, Oil Markets Group, PFC Energy, Business Week, Sept. 1, 2005”
Probably not unintentionally, PM saved the best myth for last. Some of the worst media reporting surrounding this hurricane was directly related to energy prices. In fact, we quickly heard how this was going to cause massive job cuts around the country, lead to a recession, send gasoline to $5 per gallon, and kill the Christmas shopping season.
Much like most economic predictions from the media, none of these prognostications materialized. And, according to PM, the media were all wet regarding how much damage was done to the nation’s energy complex:
“Initially, the pictures from the gulf looked bleak: oil
rigs washed up along the coast, production platforms
wrecked. In truth, Katrina inflicted minimal damage to
the offshore energy infrastructure. Only 86 of the gulf’s
4000 drilling rigs and platforms were damaged or
destroyed, and most of those were older, fixed platforms
atop unproductive wells.”
Beyond this, the subsequent storms of Rita and Wilma had a larger impact on our energy complex than Katrina, though neither garnered the same media attention. However, even with all this damage, things were repaired much quicker than expected – especially by the media that never see any good in anything:
“But recovery came more quickly than many experts
predicted. By the end of the year, overall production was
down just 8 percent, and only three refineries were still
off line. ‘This is by far the worst we’ve ever seen,’
says Ed Murphy, who is a refinery expert at the American
Petroleum Institute. ‘That we’ve recovered so quickly is
really quite extraordinary.’”
Not surprisingly, the media didn’t see it that way, and continued to talk about Katrina-related higher fuel prices negatively impacting the economy right through the end of last year.
As a result, like virtually no members of the antique media, PM adroitly demonstrated just how wrong the press were about this horrible disaster, and continue to be. Leave it to a group of mechanics to identify where that awful clanging sound was coming from…in this case, America’s pressrooms.
Noel Sheppard is an economist, business owner, and contributing writer to The Free Market Project. He is also contributing editor for the Media Research Center’s NewsBusters.org. Noel welcomes feedback.
americanthinker.com
popularmechanics.com |
