SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Hawkmoon who wrote (183569)3/16/2006 6:06:20 AM
From: Maurice Winn  Read Replies (1) of 281500
 
Hawk, you don't seem to have read past the part of my post which said that Iran should have a tactical nuclear bomb as you seem to think that would involve an Arab arms race. I don't think any others would want one on the terms which I thought Iran should have one. You should read the fine print.
<The nuclear bomb would sit in the foundations underneath the reactor, being a nice safe place where it wouldn't get lost.

If Iran shot, gaoled or otherwise removed the supervisor [supervisors probably], then the nuclear bomb controller back in Moscow would disassemble the reactor so that the materials wouldn't be taken for wrongful purposes contrary to the agreement.

>

Mqurice
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News