Sioux Nation Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sioux Nation

DJT 14.32

+1.2%

Dec 24 12:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: CalculatedRisk who wrote (61146)	3/16/2006 4:49:22 PM
From: zonkie	Read Replies (1) of 361830

Junior is wanting the line item veto power now. Line item veto might be a good idea if the president didn't use it to reward or punish people or as a partisan tool but we all know junior will abuse any power he gets so I hope they don't give it to him. Congress gave it to Clinton only to have the supreme court declare it to be unconstitutional. Now gonzales says a line item veto bill can be worded so that it is constitutional. I wouldn't be surprised if they weren't able to get junior's supreme court to give their Ok if they do change a few words in the old bill. The thing congress should do is to make those signing statements illegal which junior uses for such things as declaring he can torture people even though the bill (law) he is signing specifically makes it illegal. He has no business attaching statements to bills which if enforced someday would change what is in the bill or law.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next