SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: neolib who wrote (183535)3/16/2006 7:42:11 PM
From: Brumar89  Read Replies (1) of 281500
 
Behe and Dembski are the two biggest names in ID and what they say below sounds pretty consistent with theistic evolution, doesn't it?

Michael Behe: "I am an evolutionist in the sense that I do think natural selection explains many things ... But from what I see, the evidence only shows natural selection explaining rather small changes ... If is fine by me if common descent is true, and there is some sort of designed program to power changes over time ...";

William Dembski: "Right now I'm inclined toward a preprogrammed form of evolution in which life evolves teleologically ..".


BTW, theistic evolution is contrary to the science as taught. Only natural causes powering evolution are kosher with the theory as it is taught.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext