Welcome to Slider's Dugout Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Welcome to Slider's Dugout

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Sawdusty who wrote (1311)	3/17/2006 11:13:13 AM
From: J.B.C.	Read Replies (1) of 50506

But, on Monday, did anyone see the cord lying around (you can't hide that much cord), did anyone see the cord leading down the stairs out the door on Monday? Did anyone see all the damage done to the walls to get to the support structure, which on the WTC was mostly the outer skeleton OUTSIDE the building? And since the major structure was the external skeleton, did anyone or camera note the charges going off when the buildings failed? The fire and smoke would not have been able to hide the explosions. Was there an outage on the North Tower that weekend? Electrical outages in Facilities are not unusual, electrical substations need periodic servicing, and the WTC would have many and have to schedule various weekends to service them. Or a reconstruction project require that the sub-stations be taken down during final connection (standard construction process)? To go from knowing "A" (an electrical outage) to "B" ( the government installing explosives) is a stretch, to be generous. There may be "strong feelings on both sides", however facts and logic don't support one of those sides. Only insinuation and conjecture. Jim

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next